Comments on: Adsense Ads, Ajax, and You http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/ SEO Tools and Industry News Wed, 05 May 2010 16:01:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Denis http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3596 Denis Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:17:42 +0000 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/#comment-3596 Have implemented something like this. However in my case stuff that was in IFRAME had to be refreshed anyway, so I didnt have to hide any keywords. However there is one solution, without breaking the TOS (I think)… when you change the source of the file just make the iframe src filename related to the topic you want ads to be displayed for. It worked for me. check http://www.hungrysiam.com Have implemented something like this.
However in my case stuff that was in IFRAME had to be refreshed anyway, so I didnt have to hide any keywords.

However there is one solution, without breaking the TOS (I think)… when you change the source of the file just make the iframe src filename related to the topic you want ads to be displayed for. It worked for me. check http://www.hungrysiam.com

]]> By: Jason http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3231 Jason Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:03:29 +0000 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/#comment-3231 Even though you may not break the TOS of AdSense, hidden content (especially keywords) is not looked on favorably by the search engine companies. A friend of mine had a site kicked out of Google's index, because of hidden content (also considered cloaking). This happened over the course of him having the site up a year. He wondered why he no longer had a PR5 - instead it was grey and his site was no longer listed in Google, prompting him to contact Google for an explaination. I think his site is still unlisted to this day (that was 4 years ago!) Even though you may not break the TOS of AdSense, hidden content (especially keywords) is not looked on favorably by the search engine companies. A friend of mine had a site kicked out of Google’s index, because of hidden content (also considered cloaking). This happened over the course of him having the site up a year. He wondered why he no longer had a PR5 – instead it was grey and his site was no longer listed in Google, prompting him to contact Google for an explaination. I think his site is still unlisted to this day (that was 4 years ago!)

]]> By: Dorin http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2536 Dorin Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:31:16 +0000 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/#comment-2536 Hello all, thank you for a cool know-how!! I'm developing ajax-based web-application, and would like to use this approach for showing adsense in it. In my application, ALL content is dynamically generated and retrieved from server. I have a following question: as far as my content is shown only for logged in user, ( my app is login-protected, and each user creates account to use it ), does google bots need public access to these protected pages, so I will be able to show google ads, or that javascript will be enough ? thanks in advance, regards Hello all, thank you for a cool know-how!!

I’m developing ajax-based web-application,
and would like to use this approach for showing adsense in it. In my application,
ALL content is dynamically generated and
retrieved from server.

I have a following question:
as far as my content is shown only for logged in user, ( my app is login-protected, and each user creates account to use it ),

does google bots need public access to these protected pages, so I will be able to show google ads, or that javascript will be enough ?

thanks in advance,
regards

]]> By: B Jones http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-666 B Jones Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:30:01 +0000 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/#comment-666 @noob78: I think this method of serving ads solves a real problem in a really creative way. It's a great idea. Thanks for giving us an example. Nice site too. @noob78:
I think this method of serving ads solves a real problem in a really creative way. It’s a great idea. Thanks for giving us an example. Nice site too.

]]> By: noob78 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-665 noob78 Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:05:34 +0000 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/#comment-665 Holy schit! my article is posted here. Found this link from www.v7n.com and what do I see. This is great! it's an honor that you put it in there and your explanation is much more clearer and precise! Is it possible if you can edit the article to include sample site url? wish I could've included in the original but... jguru doesn't have edit function!! If you do, it's www.weekendstory.com . Thanks for publishing my article! Oh so far Google didn't ban my site. Holy schit! my article is posted here. Found this link from http://www.v7n.com and what do I see. This is great! it’s an honor that you put it in there and your explanation is much more clearer and precise! Is it possible if you can edit the article to include sample site url? wish I could’ve included in the original but… jguru doesn’t have edit function!! If you do, it’s http://www.weekendstory.com . Thanks for publishing my article! Oh so far Google didn’t ban my site.

]]> By: B Jones http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-657 B Jones Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:24:34 +0000 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/#comment-657 Wow. Did you actually ask about this specific technique? I know it seems kind of iffy, but I wonder. It seems like if it was used in a legitimate way, they probably let it slide. Wow. Did you actually ask about this specific technique?

I know it seems kind of iffy, but I wonder. It seems like if it was used in a legitimate way, they probably let it slide.

]]> By: sen77 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-656 sen77 Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:07:41 +0000 http://www.seologs.com/adsense-ads-ajax-and-you/#comment-656 Very! Very good idea! BUT. The oficials from G say that they would not recommend me to use this. As this is TOS violation. Sad.... Very! Very good idea! BUT.

The oficials from G say that they would not recommend me to use this. As this is TOS violation.

Sad….

]]>