PRWeb Links No Good
- Posted by Badi Jones on December 14th, 2005 - Comment on this Post »
According to Matt Cutts, links in PRWeb press releases (I’m assuming this goes for all press release and maybe article release sites) won’t help a site rank better in Google.
Speaking about the Newsweek article on Rand Fishkin, Cutts said “And I doubt Rand was expecting any direct PageRank impact from Avatar’s prweb.com press release.”
That was the only hint that was given in the actual post(http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-article-in-newsweek/), but the topic is further discussed in the comments of the post.
3 Quotes from Matt Cutts:
“a legit press release can get you written up by reporters, or editors/sites may subsequently choose to link to your site. But the actual content of the press release itself doesn’t directly affect a site. For example, on http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/10/prweb296086.php those hyperlinks don’t help avatarfinancial.com (in Google).”
“I’m not against doing press releases; press releases can be a useful part of getting traffic and building a brand. For ranking in Google, however, the main benefit of a press release is not direct links or PageRank from the press release directly; it’s primarily the people who decide to write an article and link because of that.”
“if someone is just syndicating articles from ezine or articlecity or wherever, that’s not adding a lot of value in my book”
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
One Response to “PRWeb Links No Good”
Leave a Comment
- Reminder: Remove Your Adsense Referral Ads
- Shame on DMOZ
- No Fair, It’s April 2nd
- Alexa vs Statsaholic
- I’m Still Here
- Content Manager/ Linkbait Writer Job Opening
- Talk Like a Pirate Day
- Congrats to the Red Paperclip Guy
- Yahoo Advertising on Google
- Google Juice and WashingtonPost.com
- Notifying Web Masters of Penalties via Sitemaps
- V7N Has a Blog
- Google is Still the King
- Firefox Bug in OS X
- MSN Search and Win
- SEO Refugee is Here To Stay
- Matt Cutts Interview Tonight
- New Google Toolbar Released
- SEO Contests as a Career
- Google News Out of Beta
- Google Featured on ABC NEWS
- Google Traffic Surpasses MSN
- V7ndotcom Elursrebmem Contest Started
- Huge Jump in SEO Contest Results
- Google Analytics Update
- On Your Marks: More SEO Contest Madness
- SEO Contest Update
- Promoting Redscowl
- Google Pack
- A Better BigDaddy
- Best Search Engine Community Blog
- MSN Using Descriptions From DMOZ
- And The Winner Is…Matt Cutts!
- Brett Tabke Has a Blog
- Google on AOL Deal
- This Year’s Top Searches
- World Wide Web Inventor has a Blog
- PRWeb Links No Good
- Performancing Interview with Matt Cutts
- SEO Goes Mainstream
- 3 Free SEO Tools Now Available
- Randfish Does it Again
- Nick W Says Farewell to Threadwatch
- Matt Cutts Isn’t the Only One
- SEO Refugee
- Trouble at SEOChat Forums
- Still Waiting to See Google Analytics Reports
- icedoutwheels.com?
- DMOZ: Buy Your Way In
- RustyBrick Gets Engaged
- Million Dollar Home Page Down
- Fight Email Spam
- Sitemaps for Mobile Sites
- You Don’t Use Firefox?
- Is Matt Cutts Reading my Blog?
- Blogger for Microsoft Word
- The googletestad Phenomenon
- Guaranteed Huge PageRank
- The Real GoogleGuy
- Now Howard Stern Suing Google
- Search Engine Strategies Conference Set to Begin Monday
- Site Target Adwords
- New Yahoo Audio Search
- More on Yahoo Publisher Network
- Blogger.com Hacked
- GoogleGuy: The Heat is On
- Now Anyone Can Add Search Engine Optimization Tools Quickly
- Good Content Writing Most Important for SEO?
- Official AdWords Blog
- Ujiko: Personalized Search
- Be like Google
- Google Toolbar for Firefox
- Google Patent Sumarized by Axandra
- Grokker – Visual yahoo search engine

December 14th, 2005 at 7:35 pm
I think that Matt’s rhetoric is a often little beyond Google’s implementation… but not that far behind. To some extent, his stark warnings are meant to scare and I think he purposely exagerates in hope of instilling fear in SEOs.
Google clearly hates **aggressive** SEO to a large extent because it makes their job of providing non-spam results harder. But they ARE getting VERY good at spotting blackhat and grayhat SEO.. still, I think Matt’s talking a little more tough than their actual algorithms perform.
Nevertheless, they are always getting better and better at this game and it is a good idea to carefully consider Matt’s warnings because even if I’m right and they are not quite “there”, they’ll be there **soon**.
Nevertheless, the REAL value of the Press releases was when other sites/journalists pick up those Press Releases and re-publish them on THEIR web sites. This was ALWAYS the end-game hope and even if the actual Press Release provider’s sites don’t contribute to pagerank, those times when an article does get “picked up” will still be beneficial, epecially if/when links are preserved. But this DOES take away the benefits that some might have previously enjoyed from a dozen previous Press releases which didn’t go anywhere.
I guess the moral of the story is don’t waste time writing a dozen crummy press releases… instead write one or two really good and compelling ones and then get on the phone and/or e-mail and promote that press release directly in the hopes that someone will pick it up.
–Rob McEwen